A slightly lighter legging with just one pocket, the Flanci Buffalo Running Leggings are good for the price – full of personality, decent performers on the trail and always easy to spot on the washing line.
- A pocket
- Good value
- Too colorful!
- Synthetic materials
Flanci Buffalo Running Leggings are not for the shy and retiring. It is hard to know which of Flanci’s leggings are most controversially colourful – the entire range produced by this British brand will turn heads and the Flanci Buffalos are typically flamboyant, which may rule out a lot of less-attention-seeking runners and riders, but might appeal to those who don’t mind standing out from the pack.
- Explore the best men’s running leggings in our buying guide
- Learn how to start trail running with these expert tips
- Running shorts vs capris vs leggings – which is right for you?
On the trail
The Flanci Buffalo Running Leggings are comfortable next to the skin, especially if you’re more used to wearing polyester, with just the right degree of stretch. They are thinner than the Flanci Flames (which we also tested), which is ideal for when the worst of the winter is behind you.
• RRP: $44 (US) / £38 (UK)
• Weight: 185g / 6.5oz
• Materials: Polyester (85%), spandex (15%)
• Colors: Navy blue with assorted buffalo icons
• Compatibility: Trail running, road running, hiking, skiing, orienteering, cycling, field sports
Unlike with the Flames, there is no thigh pouch, but the back pocket gets a big tick. They feature flat-lock seams for increased comfort and to prevent chafing, and have been professionally designed anatomically and ergonomically for improved circulation and recovery whilst training.
We tested these on riverside trail runs in milder weather, and found they offered a good mix of performance, protection and comfort. They didn’t feel claggy, they kept us warm, while still being breathable.
All the latest inspiration, tips and guides to help you plan your next Advnture!
Thank you for signing up to Advnture. You will receive a verification email shortly.
There was a problem. Please refresh the page and try again.