Last summer, I set off on the 96-mile West Highland Way carrying my camping gear plus all of my food for five days. My camping gear overall is pretty light, so when I had packed up my base load a few days prior to leaving and the scale showed it to be under 15 lbs, I was quite proud of myself. This is going be easy, I thought! But once I added five portions of oatmeal, five packets of mac n’ cheese, five tuna pouches plus various slices of salami, trail mix and granola bars, a liter of water, and some extra clothing, it was a different story. I wasn’t like Cheryl Strayed rolling around on a hotel room floor unable to lift her pack before setting off on the Pacific Crest Trail, but I wasn’t exactly scampering along the trail either.
On my one-night backpacking trips, my backpack is unsurprisingly considerably lighter, and I do enjoy being able to move a bit more nimbly. I’m not saying I’m ready to trade in my tent poles for trekking poles and wear down clothing instead of using a sleeping bag, but I do like the feeling of being able to go faster. Lighter is definitely easier, there’s no question there, but I’ve been wondering lately – is a heavier pack necessarily a bad thing? Assuming you’ve adjusted your backpack properly and are taking care of your posture, does it actually do you any harm, or does it just mean that you walk slower? And how much should your pack weigh for backpacking anyway?
How much should your pack weigh for backpacking?
An often repeated 'rule of thumb' in the hiking community is that your backpack should not exceed more than about 20% of your body weight. At 115lb (52kg) that means my backpack shouldn’t weigh more than 23lb (10kg) which means I need to be really careful when considering whether to bring that camping coffee maker, extra base layer or Snickers bar (naturally, I’d choose the latter). My friend Kelly is four inches taller than me and weighs 170lb, the average weight for a US female, according to the CDC. So she’d get to carry 34lb according to this rule, or 77 extra Snickers bars if she had a big enough backpack.
Basically the formula goes that the bigger you are, presuming you’re healthy, the more weight you can carry. It intuitively feels like it should be true, and I’ve probably fobbed off some heavier gear on my bigger hiking partners over the years as a result, but I recently came across some interesting modeling by a Kansas State University physics professor that turns this theory on its head.
The modeling, published in 2014 in the American Association of Physics Teachers, proposes the exact opposite of the 20% rule. In fact, the author Michael O’Shea found that as hikers get bigger, the weight of load they’re able to carry actually decreases.
The reasoning for this is that your load when you hike includes the weight of your backpack, everything inside it, plus your body. So when I went for a one night backpacking trip last week carrying a 20lb pack, I was walking with a total weight of 135lb, plus a couple more pounds if you want to include my Helly Hansen Switchback Trail HT boots (24oz) plus my clothes. But if I were hiking with Kelly and she was carrying a 34lb backpack, she’d be walking with a total weight of over 200lb, which is a lot considering that she’s only the length of a Snickers bar taller than me but we share a pretty similar body composition. She’s probably a little stronger than me, but in a sandbag toss competition, the difference would be negligible, unlike the difference between our pack weights. It turns out that, according to the modeling, she should be able to carry her 34lb pack no problem, while I should be able to carry quite a bit more than I tend to.
The modeling, which focused on healthy hikers who have comparable body composition, suggests that someone healthy of my weight should actually be able to carry up to 50lb, which is nearly half my body weight, while a hiker that weighs 175lb should try to keep their pack weight closer to 42lb (24% of body weight). Once you reach 240lb you’d be better off keeping your load down to about 14% of your weight, meaning a roughly 34lb backpack, to take into account your higher body weight.
Now this modeling is based on physics, but it isn’t the result of a large-scale study, and there are definitely good reasons not to hike long distances wearing a backpack that you can’t stand up straight in. However, it does suggest that some of us who have been agonizing over keeping our pack weight really light may be able to carry more weight, if we need to. Of course, it’s important to make sure the backpack is packed properly and adjusted to fit your body, and you’d want to get fit for hiking before setting off on a long trek with a heavy backpack, but you also don’t need to panic if your pack is a few pounds heavier than you planned, especially if you’re going on a shorter hike.
How to reduce your backpack weight
Can a backpack be too heavy? Almost certainly. There is a 2018 study on the damaging effects of schoolchildren carrying backpacks weighing up to 15% of their own body weight, which can cause biomechanical adaptations that researches indicate could increase injury risk. Of course, those are more likely to be backpacks that don’t contour to the body, don’t have waist or sternum straps, and are probably being slung over one shoulder on a still-growing body, but a 2001 Army Science Board study recommended that no soldier carry more than 50 pounds for any length of time according to NPR.
So there is wisdom in not bringing the kitchen sink with you on a hike, and there are other reasons why you might want to lighten your backpack load: you could be dealing with injury, new to hiking and building up your fitness, walking a long distance or just prefer not to carry a heavy load and that's OK. Whatever you’re reasoning, if your pack is too heavy for you to walk safely and comfortable, start with these simple tips for ultralight camping include:
All the latest inspiration, tips and guides to help you plan your next Advnture!
Julia Clarke is a staff writer for Advnture.com and the author of the book Restorative Yoga for Beginners. She loves to explore mountains on foot, bike, skis and belay and then recover on the the yoga mat. Julia graduated with a degree in journalism in 2004 and spent eight years working as a radio presenter in Kansas City, Vermont, Boston and New York City before discovering the joys of the Rocky Mountains. She then detoured west to Colorado and enjoyed 11 years teaching yoga in Vail before returning to her hometown of Glasgow, Scotland in 2020 to focus on family and writing.